Burgan, D. S. (2014). A study of emotional intelligence levels of abilities of project management practitioners. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 74(10-A(E)).
Hooper, L. A. (2014). Exploration of the project management practitioner's emotional intelligence competencies. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 75(4-A(E)).
The mission of AHRQ is to improve the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care for all Americans. As part of this mission, applications submitted to AHRQ to support health services research dissertations are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the AHRQ peer review system. Reviewers will include in their overall and individual assessments both the research project and the potential of the candidate to become an independent health services researcher (based on assessments of such items as: letters submitted, biosketches, etc.)
Marketing Dissertation Titles, Marketing Dissertation Help, Good Marketing Dissertation Topics, Dissertation Proposal Example Marketing, Marketing Dissertation Structure, Marketing Research Project Ideas, Advertising Projects for Students, Write Marketing Thesis.
The research innovations presented here address multi-disciplinary concerns. With respect to Andean archaeology, the auditory localization experiments detailed in this dissertation initiated systematic on-site human perceptual testing within the Chavín galleries to evaluate interior architectural acoustic effects at this Formative period site. This methodologically novel approach allows for a range of individual perceptual responses to be illuminated and considered, rather than foregrounding researcher observation as is typical in archaeological fieldwork. Issues pertinent to experimental psychology were addressed in the design and implementation of in-situ, "ecologically valid" experiments that directly tested subjective response to a real acoustic environment, purposefully avoiding the intrinsic artificialities of experiments conducted in laboratory settings with electro-acoustic auralizations of acoustic space. Principles of architectural acoustics and spatial sound perception were applied in a field study of interior structures shown to function together as a highly-coupled acoustic waveguide network, where right-angled corners and abrupt sectional changes between architectural elements demonstrably correspond with perceptual effects. This project has adapted theoretical and methodological models from several disciplines to relate acoustics and human experience in the context of an ancient ceremonial center.
This FOA targets the timely awarding of the doctoral degree. In the Final Progress Report, the PD/PI must provide information on the status of his/her dissertation research project, the actual or anticipated dissertation defense date, the actual or anticipated graduation date, and postdoctoral career plans (e.g., if he/she has accepted a job or postdoctoral research position, and if so, what it is).
. Are the PD/PI and mentor(s) appropriately trained and well suited to the proposed research project? Is there evidence that an appropriate level of effort will be devoted by the mentor(s) to ensure the successful completion of the dissertation project? Is there evidence that mentor(s) have been adequately prepared to actively work with the PD/PI and have actively worked with the PD/PI to date in the development of the proposed dissertation project? Does a viable mentoring plan and/or mentor/PD/PI agreement exist? Does the PD/PI demonstrate potential to have a successful career in health services research?
. Does the proposed dissertation project address an important problem unique to the mission of AHRQ? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, health care delivery, or clinical practice be advanced? What will be the effect of this research on the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, preventative interventions, or health care policies that drive this field?
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or those in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project? Does the PD/PI show promise as a research investigator in areas relevant to the application, as evidenced in his/her Biographical Sketch and letters of support? Is the advisor(s) appropriately qualified to provide guidance as needed, i.e. do they have sufficient experience and resources to provide the necessary supervision and mentoring? Has the faculty advisor indicated that sufficient time will be allocated to guide and support the PD/PI so that he/she will complete the dissertation in a timely manner?
Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field? Significance should be evaluated within the context of a doctoral dissertation: to what extent will successful completion of the project help the PD/PI to advance his/her research career goals?
This particular FOA is designed to facilitate completion of a doctoral research project and dissertation in a research area relevant to the NIMH mission and research priorities, as articulated in the NIMH Strategic Plan. Because the Research Plan component is restricted to 6 pages, a dissertation research grant application will not have the same level of detail or extensive discussion found in an R01 application. Accordingly, reviewers should evaluate the conceptual framework and general approach to the problem, rather than methodological details and preliminary data. Appropriate justification for the proposed work may be provided through literature citations, data from other sources, or from investigator-generated data. Preliminary data are not required.
The Stanford IRB-approved psychoacoustic experimentation detailed in this dissertation was designed to elucidate relationships between Chavín gallery acoustics and the perception of sound source locations by humans within these spaces. Specifically, how does gallery architecture relate to human auditory localization? This inceptive research question followed analyses of measured data showing interior architectural acoustics consistent with "vague" auditory localization cues, contrasted by subsequent gallery fieldwork that demonstrated in-situ examples of sound source localization accuracy. Through on-site observation and measurement, the directivity of acoustic waveguide-like architecture was identified as an influential factor in sound transmission within Chavín's interior spaces. The sectional dimensional variations of gallery architecture correspond not only to spatial segmentations, but to demonstrable and perceptible acoustic effects. Field measurements and a computational acoustic model have confirmed that gallery acoustics can be functionally characterized as a highly-coupled network of partially segregated spatial units. However, the perceptual implications of the acoustic features created by these architectural forms were uncertain without a contextually accurate subjective study. Because extant gallery architecture is enclosed and considered structurally intact, the research question could be addressed via psychoacoustic experimentation conducted in the galleries. To systematically evaluate architectural-perceptual relationships, the author designed and implemented on- site auditory localization experiments that drew its volunteer adult participants from members of the multicultural, Stanford-affiliated archaeological research project at Chavín. These experiments tested participants' localization of a realistic sound stimulus (a recording of a site-excavated shell horn reproduced through identical loudspeakers from different locations) across a range of typical gallery architectural forms that bridged source and "listener" locations.