Protection of Human Subjects: A discussion of human subjects protection must be included if the proposed research involves any contact with or data on humans (e.g., patients, providers, administrators); including data obtained from secondary publicly or privately available data sources. This section does not count toward the 10 page limitation. If human subjects are involved, the applicant must also check ‘yes’ in the appropriate box described in the ‘Other Project Information Component Section’ of the SF424 R&R application form.
You are conducting a piece of research looking at prejudice. Whilst participants are given a questionnaire to complete that measures their prejudice, it is not obvious from the questions that this is the case. Furthermore, participants are not told that the research is about prejudice because it is felt that this could alter their responses. After all, few people would be happy if other people thought they were prejudice. As a result, if participants knew that this is the purpose of the study, they may well provide responses that they think will make them appear less prejudice.
As noted above, individuals supported under National Research Service Award (NRSA) mechanisms, including T32, F31 and F32 research training awards, are eligible to apply for a dissertation award, with funding limitations as described above. In such instances, the application must include a statement describing the expenses requested under the dissertation grant application which are not supported through the active training grant or fellowship. The request for support must also satisfy applicant institutional policies. Recipients of mentored career development awards are not eligible for dissertation support.
In addition, eligible institutions must have an accredited, doctoral degree-granting program in the candidate's area of study. The applicant institution must be the institution at which the PD/PI is pursuing doctoral studies.
You are conducting a study in a new context, location and/or culture, where well-established measurement procedures no longer reflect the new context, location, and/or culture. As a result, there is a need to take a well-established measurement procedure, which acts as your criterion, but you need to create a new measurement procedure that is more appropriate for the new context, location, and/or culture. The new measurement procedure may only need to be modified or it may need to be completely altered. However, irrespective of whether a new measurement procedure only needs to be modified, or completely altered, it must be based on a criterion (i.e., a well-established measurement procedure).
If you are a new undergraduate based on the Reading campus, you will be invited to join our online course, Study Smart. This brief online course, developed by the Study Advice team, aims to give you the best possible preparation for studying at university level and is exclusively available to University of Reading students. It focuses on three key areas of university-level study:
Should applicants wish to place data collected under this FOA in a public archive, which can provide protections for the data (e.g., as required by confidentiality provisions of the statute applicable to AHRQ-supported projects, 42 USC 299c-3(c) and manage the distribution of non-identifiable data for an indefinite period of time, they may. The application should include a description of any archiving plan in the study design and include information about this in the budget justification section of the application. In addition, applicants should consider how to structure informed consent statements or other human subject protection procedures to permit or restrict disclosures of identifiable data, as warranted.
This Study Guide addresses the task Write Dissertation of writing a dissertation. It aims to help you to feel confident in the construction of this extended piece of writing, and to
You need to consider the purpose of the study and measurement procedure; that is, whether you are trying (a) to use an existing, well-established measurement procedure in order to create a new measurement procedure (i.e., concurrent validity), or (b) to examine whether a measurement procedure can be used to make predictions (i.e., predictive validity).
While I wish I had time to read all of the responses to this article, I only found this piece and this website for that matter through research undertaken alongside my studies – I have a qualifying law degree where one of my specialisms is sexual offences, and am currently studying a Masters in Law.
I’m a law student currently doing my dissertation. the title is :
should the UK adopt a statute of limitations with regards to historical sexual offence as opposed to bringing such cases to light under the public interest test?
My key focus is the treatment of the accused and the possibility that the CPS are merely looking to get an easy conviction by starting a modern day witch hunt. Other parts of my paper will look at the possibility of these alleged victims coming forward so may years later to jump on the band wagon of the UK’s growing compensation culture.
After reading your entry I was hoping that i could communicate with you via email out of this medium to possibly interview you in order to support my argument?